Every AI agent. Every governance gap. Measured.
263 institutions. 49,231 agents. 162,399 relationships. 45 countries. 8 sectors. 32 regulators.
Source: Meridian Autonomy Rating™ (MAR), N=263 institutions. Each dot represents one institution, coloured by dominant governance weakness. Rating scale: B− (highest) to E+ (lowest).
© 2026 Meridian Autonomy™. All rights reserved. Proprietary dataset. Reproduction prohibited.
263
Institutions
49,231
AI Agents
14
Governance Dimensions
45
Countries
95.5%
Halt Absent
FOUR INSTRUMENTS
Observatory
System-wide vendor concentration analysis. Which vendors dominate your sector? Where does concentration create systemic risk? How does your institution compare?
Telescope
Institution-level peer comparison. Your governance posture benchmarked against sector peers, regional peers, and rating band peers across 14 dimensions.
Compass
Role-specific regulatory intelligence. A CRO sees regulatory exposure surfaces. A CISO sees halt gaps and containment failures. Each view maps to a regulatory obligation.
Simulator
Cascade failure modelling. Remove a governance node and trace the propagation path. Which agents lose oversight? Which regulatory perimeters breach?